Dharmesh Patel v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 202117-70836California359 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 8 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DHARMESH BALUBHAI PATEL, No. 17-70836
Petitioner, Agency No. A072-176-625
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 6, 2021** Seattle, Washington
Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Dharmesh Balubhai Patel, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his second motion to
reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We
review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and we review de novo due process…