Ana Perez-Saborit v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 202120-73102California682 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

DEC 8 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANA ELSY PEREZ-SABORIT, No. 20-73102

Petitioner, Agency No. A213-352-357

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2021** Submission Withdrawn November 23, 2021 Resubmitted December 8, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Ana Elsy Perez-Saborit, a native and citizen of Cuba, petitions for review of

a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order upholding the immigration judge’s

(IJ) denial of her applications for withholding of removal and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Page 2 of

Convention Against Torture (CAT). We deny the petition for review.

1. Substantial evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.