Tomer Graziani v. Matthew Whitaker

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202121-55190California682 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TOMER GRAZIANI; RACHAEL No. 21-55190 KATHERINE WILMOTH, AKA Rachael Katherine Eicher-Graziani, D.C. No. 5:18-cv-02420-CBM-SP Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 6, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellants Tomer Graziani and Rachael Katherine Eicher-Graziani

(collectively, the Grazianis) filed suit challenging the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appeals’ (BIA) determination that that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.