Sandra Quinones v. County of Orange

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202120-56177California1,119 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDRA QUINONES, Individually and as No. 20-56177 successor in interest to Baby Quinones, deceased, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-00666-JVS-KES Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF ORANGE; DOES, 1-10,

inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 20, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges Concurrence by Judge VANDYKE

Sandra Quinones appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 civil rights claim against Orange County. She brought her claim outside

the statute of limitations period. The district court held that the statute was not

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. tolled and thus dismissed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.