Ina Rodman v. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202120-16646California723 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
INA ANN RODMAN, No. 20-16646
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-03732-WHO
v.
MEMORANDUM*
OTSUKA AMERICA
PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 17, 2021 San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER, W. FLETCHER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Ina Rodman appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., in this product-liability action. Rodman
alleges that Otsuka’s antipsychotic drug Abilify caused her to develop tardive
dyskinesia (TD). Rodman sued Otsuka under a failure-to-warn theory, contending
that although the Abilify label discussed the risk of TD, it underreported the actual
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. incidence rate. The…