Donald Catherine v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202120-16975California645 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD CATHERINE, No. 20-16975

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01487-JAM-DB v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, W. FLETCHER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Donald Catherine sued Wells Fargo Bank in California state court, alleging

that it mishandled the servicing of his home loan. He asserted claims under

California law and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C.

§ 2605(e). Wells Fargo removed the case to the Eastern District of California based

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.