Danny Fabricant v. J. Shartle
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202118-15995California664 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANNY FABRICANT, No. 18-15995
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:15-cv-00236-JGZ
v.
MEMORANDUM*
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 7, 2021 ** San Francisco, California
Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Danny Fabricant, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s
order granting summary judgment and dismissing his lawsuit seeking declaratory
and injunctive relief for alleged violations of his First Amendment right to receive
mail, and from its denial of his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b).
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have jurisdiction…