Danny Fabricant v. J. Shartle

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202118-15995California664 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANNY FABRICANT, No. 18-15995

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:15-cv-00236-JGZ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

J. T. SHARTLE, Warden,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 7, 2021 ** San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Danny Fabricant, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s

order granting summary judgment and dismissing his lawsuit seeking declaratory

and injunctive relief for alleged violations of his First Amendment right to receive

mail, and from its denial of his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.