Charles Brown v. the Lakes Crossing Center

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202121-15103California977 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES R. BROWN, No. 21-15103

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01363-GMN-DJA v.

THE LAKES CROSSING CENTER; MEMORANDUM*

NICKOLAS H. CULPEPPER; SHELLY

BRYANT,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 19, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Charles Brown brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging

that Defendants Shelly Bryant and Nickolas Culpepper, his caseworker and

treating physician at the state-run Lake’s Crossing Center, conspired to deprive

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. him of due process in connection with a Sell1 hearing in state court. Invoking the

Rooker–Feldman doctrine, the district court dismissed the case for lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.