Aldino Baculio v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202120-73472California624 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALDINO ABEJO BACULIO, No. 20-73472

Petitioner, Agency No. A099-267-586

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 6, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Aldino Baculio seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(BIA) decision denying his application for a waiver of the joint filing requirement

to remove the conditions on his permanent residency under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1186a(c)(4)(B) because he failed to establish that he entered his marriage in good

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). faith. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1), see Oropeza-Wong…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.