People v. Williams CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 10, 2021C092557California2,874 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/10/21 P. v. Williams CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Nevada) ----

THE PEOPLE, C092557

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SF99-225)

v.

STEVEN MARK WILLIAMS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Steven Mark Williams filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We requested supplemental briefing from the parties on whether the trial court erred in determining defendant’s grand theft conviction was ineligible for relief under

1 Penal Code section 1170.18. 1 Having considered the parties’ supplemental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.