United States v. Ryan Frankforter

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202120-30249California759 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 10 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30249

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 6:15-cr-00011-CCL-5 v.

RYAN SCOT FRANKFORTER, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 7, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Ryan Scot Frankforter appeals the sentence he received upon his third

revocation of supervised release. Frankforter admitted to violating, or was found

guilty of violating, a total of nine conditions of supervised release. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. Frankforter contends that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.