United States v. Ernest Andujo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202120-50043California685 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 10 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50043

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00835-DSF-1 v.

ERNEST ARMANDO ANDUJO, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON and LEE, Circuit Judges, and KENNELLY,*** District Judge.

Ernest Andujo appeals his convictions for possession of unregistered firearm

silencers in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) and possession of firearm silencers

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.