Good Job Games v. Saygames, LLC
Opinion
Opinion
facts is necessary.’” Butcher’s Union Loc. No. 498, United Food & Com. Workers
v. SDC Inv., Inc., 788 F.2d 535, 540 (9th Cir. 1986) (internal citation omitted).
In requesting leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery, GJG presented
proposed interrogatories and requests for production. GJG sought specific
information from SayGames, including the downloads of, revenue derived from, and
distribution agreements regarding Cannon Shot! in the United States; SayGames’
efforts to advertise, market, license, commercialize, or profit from Cannon Shot! in
the United States; and SayGames’ ability to engage in country-specific distribution
of Cannon Shot!, including the ability to choose distribution in the United States. In
a number of our recent decisions regarding personal jurisdiction and Internet-based
companies, we have made significant reference to the type of information that GJG
seeks in discovery. See AMA Multimedia, LLC v. Wanat, 970 F.3d 1201, 1210–
(9th Cir. 2020); Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Techs., Inc., 647 F.3d 1218, 1230 (9th
2 Cir. 2011); see also Ayla, LLC v. Ayla Skin Pty. Ltd., 11 F. 4th 972, 980–83 (9th Cir.