Florentino Galeana v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202119-71361California660 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 10 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FLORENTINO JAIMES GALEANA, No. 19-71361

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-534-400

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 8, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: LUCERO,*** IKUTA, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Florentino Galeana (Petitioner) seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of his applications for cancellation of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Carlos F. Lucero, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. removal, asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against

Torture (CAT), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.