Carlos Plancarte-Tofolla v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202120-70808California603 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 10 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS IVAN PLANCARTE- No. 20-70808 TOFOLLA, AKA Carlos Ivan Plancarte, AKA Carlos Ivan Plancartetafoll, Agency No. A205-322-175

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 18, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, Senior District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. Carlos Ivan Plancarte-Tofolla petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for withholding of removal and relief under

the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We deny…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.