United States v. Daniel Baker

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 13 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30042

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 6:20-cr-00006-SEH-1 v.

DANIEL WAYNE BAKER, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, BRESS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Following a conditional guilty plea to unlawful possession of a firearm by a

prohibited person, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), Daniel Wayne Baker appeals from a

district court order denying his motion to suppress evidence. “We review [the]

denial of a motion to suppress de novo, and the district court’s factual findings for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). clear…