Sirak Eyob v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 13, 202120-73676California996 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 13 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SIRAK EYOB, No. 20-73676

Petitioner, Agency No. A203-679-648

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 6, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and OWENS Circuit Judges.

Sirak Eyob (Eyob), a native and citizen of Eritrea, petitions for review of an

order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming, without opinion,

the decision of the Immigration Judge (IJ) finding his asylum application frivolous,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and denying asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT). We DENY his petition in part and DISMISS in part.

1. “Because the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.