Miriam Gomez-Cantillano v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 13, 202119-72682California460 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 13 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIRIAM GOMEZ-CANTILLANO, No. 19-72682

Petitioner, Agency No. A203-710-976

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney AND ORDER General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 7, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and CHOE-GROVES,** Judge.

Petitioner Miriam Gomez-Cantillano, a native and citizen of Nicaragua,

petitions for review of an order issued in expedited removal proceedings. We

dismiss the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. We lack jurisdiction to review expedited removal proceedings, including to

review the determination that Petitioner did not establish a credible fear of

persecution or torture. See 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.