Artem Pakhol v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 13, 202120-71959California332 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
DEC 13 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARTEM PAKHOL, No. 20-71959
Petitioner, Agency No. A201-910-367
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 8, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: LUCERO,*** IKUTA, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Artem Pakhol seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (BIA) dismissing his administrative appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Carlos F. Lucero, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. order denying his request for a continuance to obtain counsel, and affirming the