Artem Pakhol v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 13, 202120-71959California332 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 13 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARTEM PAKHOL, No. 20-71959

Petitioner, Agency No. A201-910-367

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 8, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: LUCERO,*** IKUTA, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Artem Pakhol seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) dismissing his administrative appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Carlos F. Lucero, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. order denying his request for a continuance to obtain counsel, and affirming the

IJ’s denial of Pakhol’s applications…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.