Cesar Alcaraz-Enriquez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
19 F.4th 1224
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 202115-71553California4,314 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bea, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESAR ALCARAZ-ENRIQUEZ, No. 15-71553 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A075-191-250

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, ORDER AND Respondent. OPINION

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed December 14, 2021

Before: Carlos T. Bea and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and David C. Nye, * District Judge.

Order Opinion by Judge Bea

* The Honorable David C. Nye, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation. ALCARAZ-ENRIQUEZ V. GARLAND

SUMMARY **

Immigration

In an order for publication, the panel (1) withdrew the opinion filed on September 16, 2021, on remand from the Supreme Court; (2) replaced it with a superseding opinion; and (3) unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing, and ordered that no further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc would be entertained. In the superseding opinion, the panel granted in part and denied in part Cesar Alcaraz-Enriquez’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.