Tzilacatzin Oregon-Reynoso v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 202120-73505California1,085 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 14 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TZILACATZIN OREGON-REYNOSO, No. 20-73505
Petitioner, Agency No. A091-868-847
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 9, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, IKUTA, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Tzilacatzin Oregon-Reynoso petitions for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his claims for withholding of removal and protection
under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.
“Whether a group constitutes a ‘particular social group’ [(“PSG”)] … is a
question of law,”…