Tyler Miller v. Steve Watson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 202120-35922California474 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 14 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TYLER MILLER, an individual, No. 20-35922
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00562-SB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STEVE WATSON, an individual,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Stacie F. Beckerman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 8, 2021 Seattle, Washington
Before: McKEOWN and BADE, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,** District Judge.
Tyler Miller appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment
against his Oregon state law claim for whistleblower retaliation. We have
jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. further proceedings.