United States v. Adam Stargazer

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 14 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10282

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:17-cr-01622-CKJ-DTF-1 v.

ADAM STARGAZER, AKA Damon MEMORANDUM* Alexander Grey, AKA Dale Richard Slack,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Adam Stargazer appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking his

supervised release for the second time. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

Stargazer first contends that, at his initial appearance, the magistrate judge

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). violated his right to due process by…