People v. Arredondo CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 2021B309784California583 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 12/14/21 P. v. Arredondo CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

THE PEOPLE, B309784

Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA350813 v.

ANGEL ARREDONDO,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David V. Herriford, Judge. Affirmed.

Patricia A. Scott, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

____________________ Conforming to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), Angel Arredondo’s counsel filed an opening brief containing a statement of facts but raising no issues. Counsel asks this court to review the record independently and to determine…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.