Lee v. United Escrow Co. CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 2021B308739California3,587 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 12/14/21 Lee v. United Escrow Co. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

CAROLINE S. LEE, B308739

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC697147) v.

UNITED ESCROW COMPANY

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents;

BOW TIE REALTY &

INVESTMENT, INC.,

Intervener and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Samantha P. Jessner, Judge. Affirmed. Jack H. Karpeles for Plaintiff and Appellant. Kim, Park, Choi & Yi and Michael Yi; Biggins Law Group and Chad Biggins for Defendant and Respondent United Escrow Company. Biggins Law Group and Chad Biggins for Intervener and Respondent Bow Tie Realty & Investment, Inc. No appearance for Defendant and Respondent Tracy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.