Broussalian

Broussalian v. Broussalian CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 2021B311983California5,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/14/21 Broussalian v. Broussalian CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

STEVE BROUSSALIAN, B311983

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 19BBCV00671)

SUSAN ARZOUMANIAN-

BROUSSALIAN et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, John J. Kralik, Judge. Affirmed. Heller & Edwards and Mark L. Edwards for Plaintiff and Appellant. Shahen Hairapetian for Defendants and Respondents Susan Arzoumanian-Broussalian and Sarkis Allen Arzomanian. ___________________________ After the trial court sustained a demurrer to Steve Broussalian’s second amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.