Nalbandian

Nalbandian v. The Camden Development CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 15, 2021B303861California2,077 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/15/21 Nalbandian v. The Camden Development CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

GREGORY NALBANDIAN, B303861

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. BC719595)

THE CAMDEN DEVELOPMENT,

INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Anthony J. Mohr, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of Martin Stanley and Martin Louis Stanley for Plaintiff and Appellant. Shaw Koepke & Satter, John W. Shaw, Lisa A. Satter, and Julie A. Mullane, for Defendant and Respondent. Plaintiff and appellant Gregory Nalbandian (Nalbandian) had five opportunities to file a complaint against defendant and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.