Fabiola Camorlinga-Cruz v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 202120-71642California599 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FABIOLA ALICIA CAMORLINGA- No. 20-71642

CRUZ,

Agency No. A206-548-289 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 10, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, MILLER, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Fabiola Camorlinga-Cruz petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ)

denial of asylum, statutory withholding of removal, and withholding of removal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).1 We have jurisdiction to review

final orders of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1), and deny the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.