Eunhea Kwak v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 202118-73382California819 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EUNHEA KWAK, No. 18-73382

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-407-945

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 10, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, BRESS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Eunhea Kwak, a citizen of South Korea, petitions for review of a decision by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal of an Immigration

Judge’s (IJ) order denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction to review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kwak’s petition under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.1 We review questions of law,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.