Sorden

Filed 6/15/21 (mod.); pub. order 6/15/21 follows unmodified opn. (attached); reposted with mod. order

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D076458

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCN393022)

MARK AARON SORDEN, ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION AND DENYING

Defendant and Appellant. REHEARING

NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

The opinion filed May 18, 2021, is hereby modified as follows: 1. On page 7, four lines from the bottom, at the end of the paragraph—i.e., immediately after “CPO.”—add the following new footnote 4 and renumber the remaining footnotes: In a petition for rehearing, Appellant argues that Government Code section 68081 requires rehearing because the “theory” that the CPO cannot be collaterally attacked “was not briefed by either party.” (Capitalization and bolding omitted.) We disagree. By its terms, Government Code section 68081 requires a rehearing to afford the parties an opportunity to provide supplemental briefing only where the appellate court’s…