Xu

Xu v. Huang CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2021B311883California6,610 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/16/21 Xu v. Huang CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

TIFFANY YAN XU, B311883

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20PSCV00695) v.

HAIDI WENWU HUANG et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gloria White-Brown, Judge. Reversed. Amin Talati Wasserman, William P. Cole and Matthew R. Orr for Plaintiff and Appellant. Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, Craig J. Mariam, Gregory S. Martin and Eunice J. Liao for Defendants and Respondents.

__________________________ Plaintiff and appellant Tiffany Yan Xu, chief executive officer of Sky Vision Insurance Company (Sky Vision), and defendants and respondents Haidi…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.