William Peck v. City of Tucson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202121-15198California1,089 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

William Peck, No. 21-15198

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-00017-LCK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

City of Tucson,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Lynnette C. Kimmins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2021** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: GILMAN,*** BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

William Peck appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of his former

employer, the City of Tucson, Arizona (the City), on his hostile-work-environment

and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.