United States v. Kenneth Osteen

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202120-50261California525 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 16 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50261

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00585-JFW-1 v.

KENNETH OSTEEN, AKA Ken Bone, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 8, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kenneth Osteen (Osteen) appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, of

violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (felon in possession of firearm and ammunition).

Osteen contends that, although the evidence at trial may have been sufficient to

show his knowledge of the firearm and intent to exercise control over it, the

evidence did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.