Travis Amaral v. Charles Ryan
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202119-15003California717 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TRAVIS WADE AMARAL, No. 19-15003
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-00594-JAT
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CHARLES L. RYAN; ATTORNEY
GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF
ARIZONA,
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 7, 2021 San Francisco, California
Before: WARDLAW, BRESS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Travis Amaral appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas
corpus, arguing that his combined sentence of life with eligibility for parole after
57.5 years for crimes he committed as a juvenile constitutes cruel and unusual
punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. U.S. Const. amend. VIII. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(c)(1)(A), and we affirm.
“We review de…