Amzn

Sheela Ursal v. Amzn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202120-35537California400 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHEELA URSAL, No. 20-35537

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01701-BJR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AMAZON.COM, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Sheela Ursal appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her

diversity action alleging Washington state law claims arising from her

employment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the basis of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). applicable statute of limitations. Cholla Ready…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.