Amzn
Sheela Ursal v. Amzn
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202120-35537California400 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SHEELA URSAL, No. 20-35537
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01701-BJR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
AMAZON.COM, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2021**
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Sheela Ursal appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her
diversity action alleging Washington state law claims arising from her
employment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a
dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the basis of the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). applicable statute of limitations. Cholla Ready…