Sender Catzin Blanco v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202120-71751California692 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SENDER DARBELIO CATZIN BLANCO, No. 20-71751

Petitioner, Agency No. A089-859-476

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 8, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, BRESS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Sender Darbelio Catzin Blanco petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge

(“IJ”) decision denying his applications for withholding of removal and protection

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We review factual findings and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denials of withholding of removal and CAT relief for substantial evidence. Yali

Wang…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.