Spearman

Patrick Goodwin v. Spearman

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202119-17220California758 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK GLENN GOODWIN, No. 19-17220

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:17-cv-01604-JLT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SPEARMAN,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 10, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and IKUTA and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Patrick Glenn Goodwin, an incarcerated individual in California, appeals the

district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus

challenging his conviction for battery under California law. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review the district court’s denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.