Jie Zhong Duenas v. Town of Oro Valley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202121-15340California1,287 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIE ZHONG DUENAS, No. 21-15340

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00206-JGZ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY; COOK, Oro Valley Police Detective, in their individual capacities; ANDY LOPEZ, Oro Valley Police Officer Sgt., in their individual capacities,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and IKUTA and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Jie Zhong Duenas appeals the district court’s order granting summary

judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Town of Oro Valley (“Town”), Forrest

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cook (“Detective Cook”), and Andy Lopez…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.