Jack Roy v. Laborer's Local 737

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202121-35103California1,023 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JACK B. ROY, an individual, No. 21-35103

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01695-YY

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LABORER'S LOCAL 737, a domestic nonprofit mutual benefit corporation; ZACKARY CULVER, an individual,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 9, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, BRESS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Jack Roy appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment

to Laborer’s Local 737 (“Local 737”) in Roy’s action under the Age Discrimination

in Employment Act (“ADEA”) and Oregon’s age discrimination laws, Or. Rev. Stat.

§ 659A.030(1)(a)–(c). Roy claims that Local 737 terminated him because of his age.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.