David Phillips v.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: DAVID LEE PHILLIPS, Attorney at No. 21-15387 Law, Bar No. 538, ______________________________ D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02213-MMD

DAVID LEE PHILLIPS,

MEMORANDUM*

Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

David Lee Phillips, an attorney, appeals pro se from the district court’s order

imposing reciprocal discipline following his four-year suspension by the Nevada

Supreme Court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an

abuse of discretion. In re Corrinet, 645 F.3d 1141, 1145 (9th Cir. 2011). We

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court did not abuse…