Daniel Verduzco v. C. Ducart
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202120-17100California341 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL VERDUZCO, No. 20-17100
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:18-cv-04596-JSW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
C. E. DUCART; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
G. KIMBREL,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2021**
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Daniel Verduzco appeals pro se from the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate
indifference to his health and safety. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We
affirm.