Braulio Sarabia-Perez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202117-71189California619 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRAULIO SARABIA-PEREZ, No. 17-71189

Petitioner, Agency No. A201-240-981

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Braulio Sarabia-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and denying

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his request for administrative closure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.