Arron Simmons v. Shasta County District Attorne
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202121-15697California275 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARRON THOMAS SIMMONS, No. 21-15697
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00242-KJM-AC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SHASTA COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2021**
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Arron Thomas Simmons appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging his
sentence as unconstitutional. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 443, 447 (9th Cir.…