Antonia Osorio Herrera v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202120-71250California1,156 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIA OSORIO HERRERA, et. al. No. 20-71250

Petitioners, BIA A202-176-596

A202-176-597

v. A202-176-598

A202-176-599

MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 18, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,** District Judge.

Lead Petitioner Antonia Osorio Herrera and three of her children, as rider-

derivatives (collectively, “Petitioners”), petition for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of her appeal of an Immigration Judge’s

(“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum and withholding of removal. Osorio

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.