42 Ventures, LLC v. Vinit Mav

facts that might save its Complaint, the district court erred in dismissing the

Complaint without granting leave to amend. See Ariz. Students’ Ass’n v. Ariz. Bd.

of Regents, 824 F.3d 858, 871 (9th Cir. 2016).

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal and REMAND with

instructions to grant leave to amend.

1 The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied an alternative motion to transfer venue to the Northern District of California. 42 Ventures pleads no facts that could show that Appellees availed themselves of California’s benefits or directed their actions to California. See Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Techs., Inc., 647 F.3d 1218, 1223 (9th Cir. 2011) (concluding that “the jurisdictional analyses under [California] law and federal due process are the same”).

4