Save Civita Because Sudberry Won't v. City of San Diego

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2021D077591California23,286 words

Opinion

Opinion

I.

INTRODUCTION

The City of San Diego (City) certified an environmental impact report (EIR) for the “Serra Mesa Community Plan [SMCP] Amendment Roadway Connection Project” (Project) and approved an amendment to the SMCP and the City’s General Plan to reflect the proposed roadway.1 The proposed four- lane major road—together with a median, bicycle lanes, and pedestrian pathways—would run in a north/south direction between Phyllis Place in Serra Mesa to Via Alta / Franklin Ridge Road in Mission Valley.2 Via Alta and Franklin Ridge Road are contained within Civita, a partially built out mixed-use development that the City approved in 2008.3 Save Civita Because Sudberry Won’t (“Save Civita”) filed a combined petition for writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief (Petition / Complaint) against the City, challenging the City’s certification of the EIR and approval of the Project.4 In its Petition /

The resolution approving the amendment noted that it “reconciles a conflict between the Serra Mesa and Mission Valley community plans because the Mission Valley Community Plan [MVCP] includes the street connection but the current version of [SMCP] does…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.