Crocus Advisors v. Habashi CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 17, 2021A161032California2,446 words

Opinion

Opinion

Banke, J.

Filed 12/17/21 Crocus Advisors v. Habashi CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publi- cation or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or o r- dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

CROCUS ADVISORS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

A161032

v. EHAB HABASHI et al., (Marin County Super. Ct. No. Defendants and Appellants.

CIV1901900)

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

This is an appeal from a judgment following a bench trial in an action to enforce private loan agreements. Defendants and appellants Ehab Habashi and Linda Habashi, who have represented themselves throughout these proceedings, have submitted an extremely limited record on appeal. As we explain, we can discern no error based on that record, and therefore affirm the judgment. The record consists of a clerk’s transcript containing the following: an unverified complaint filed May…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.