United States v. Abu Abdul-Latif

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 202121-30130California371 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30130

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00228-JLR-

v.

ABU KHALID ABDUL-LATIF, AKA MEMORANDUM*

Joseph Anthony Davis,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Abu Khalid Abdul-Latif appeals from the district court’s order denying his

renewed motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Abdul-Latif contends that the district court erred by conflating the two

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). distinct inquires…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.