People v. Tucker CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 2021C091956California3,475 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

Filed 12/20/21 P. v. Tucker CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C091956

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 19F6359)

v.

DANIEL WAYNE TUCKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Daniel Wayne Tucker guilty of multiple offenses related to domestic violence. He was sentenced to state prison for a term of eight years and the trial court imposed various fines and fees. On appeal, defendant contends: (1) the trial court prejudicially impacted his constitutional rights to confront and cross-examine witnesses by denying his request to recall the prosecution’s main witness; and (2) the court erred in imposing various fees, fines, and assessments without first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.