United States v. Dominick Aragon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 20, 202121-30021California1,051 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 20 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30021

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:20-cr-00267-MC-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DOMINICK JEFFREY ARAGON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 7, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

While serving two undischarged state sentences—one for a revocation of

probation, and the other for driving under the influence of intoxicants—Dominick

Aragon pleaded guilty to a federal charge for distribution of cocaine, in violation

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). Aragon was sentenced to 30 months’

imprisonment, with 15 months to run concurrently with his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.